Home / Research

Evidence-based AI,
rigorously validated.

Every model deployed in ClinexaOS is backed by clinical research, peer-reviewed benchmarks, and real-world validation studies. We publish our methodology so clinicians can evaluate our claims independently.

300M+
Curated training cases
97.8%
Mean diagnostic confidence
12
Published validation studies
40+
Specialties benchmarked

Our Research Approach

ClinexaOS operates a dedicated clinical AI research division staffed by radiologists, data scientists, and biostatisticians. All models undergo a standardised validation protocol before deployment — including retrospective performance analysis, prospective clinical trials, and independent third-party review.

We measure performance against established clinical reference standards and report all metrics transparently, including sensitivity, specificity, AUC, and calibration curves per specialty and demographic subgroup.

Benchmark commitment: We do not selectively report metrics. Every published study includes full performance tables across all tested subgroups, including cases where our models underperform.

Selected Publications & Studies

2024

Multi-centre validation of AI-assisted chest CT interpretation across 6 hospital systems

Performance of ClinexaOS v2.1 was evaluated across 42,000 chest CT studies in six academic medical centres. Mean AUC: 0.963 for pathology detection.

Journal of Thoracic Imaging · DOI: 10.xxxx/jti.2024.001
2024

Reducing radiologist reporting time through structured AI pre-reads: a prospective cohort study

Radiologist reporting time reduced by 38% when using ClinexaOS structured pre-reads, without increase in error rate.

European Radiology · DOI: 10.xxxx/er.2024.017
2023

Specialty-aware AI inference: adapting diagnostic language models to clinical subspecialties

Technical methodology paper describing our specialty-context injection architecture and its effect on diagnostic accuracy.

npj Digital Medicine · DOI: 10.xxxx/npjdm.2023.042
2023

Comparative evaluation of AI confidence calibration in diagnostic imaging tasks

ClinexaOS confidence scores were found to be well-calibrated across modalities, with mean Expected Calibration Error (ECE) of 0.031.

Medical Image Analysis · DOI: 10.xxxx/media.2023.091

Training Data Methodology

Our 300M+ case training corpus was assembled through partnerships with academic medical centres, national health archives, and curated open datasets. All training data is:

  • De-identified using HIPAA Safe Harbour and Expert Determination methods
  • Annotated by board-certified specialists with minimum 5 years clinical experience
  • Reviewed for demographic representation and bias mitigation
  • Subject to ongoing data quality audits and retrospective labelling review
  • Sourced under data sharing agreements compliant with applicable law
Research Areas
🫁

Pulmonology & Thoracic

🫀

Cardiology

🧠

Neurology & Neuro-radiology

🦴

Musculoskeletal

🔬

Pathology & Histology

👁️

Ophthalmology

🩺

General Diagnostics

Research Partnerships
🏥

Six academic medical centre partners across three continents for prospective study access.

📊

Independent third-party model audits conducted annually by certified clinical AI evaluators.

📧

info@clinexaos.com

Research collaboration